Crime Prevention Through Strategic ICT Application (CPTSIA) Framework
This is about
Information and Communication Technology applications for tackling most crimes
that have continued to pose daunting challenges to contemporary society. Its
pivot is on developing a framework for the effective application of WEB 2.0
tools and internet forensics techniques in crime prevention through guided
community-based collective action. Such collective action is driven by
strategic information sharing and purposeful collaborations through suitable
interactive ICT platforms. Conceptually, this proposes a shift in crime
prevention paradigms tagged Crime
Prevention Through Strategic ICT Application (CPTSIA). This is a new
approach structured to suit our e-evolving society, enhance Open Source
Intelligence (OSINT) applicability and the impacts of ICT on our fast changing
lifestyles.
In preparing the
grounds for enhancing the users’ appreciation of the framework member
components and their cardinal roles, the notion that today’s innovations in
ICT, ubiquitous computing and pervasive application of ICT tools are combining
to provide incentives rather than deterrence to criminals were deeply examined
in the detailed research report. The validity or otherwise of these
assumptions were also x-rayed side-by-side with the principal assumptions for
the framework. Overall, providing the framework for steering-back these
innovations in ICT against crime rising waves is what this piece is set to
achieve. The emphasis on the side of technology is chiefly on the WEB 2.0, and
sparingly on internet forensic techniques, whereas the emphasis on the human
side is on taking advantage of accessible ICT interactive platforms for
motivating, driving and sustaining a purposeful community oriented mass-action
against crime through strategic information sharing.
Conceptually, from the input to processing
and output section, the framework infrastructure consists of five principal
pillars and several components under each pillar as follows:
1. The RESOURCES pillar. This is about the resources or
means available for addressing the challenge - issues associated with enhancing
the effectiveness of crime prevention for better results. These means are
identified as critical components that must all add to the inputs for achieving
the pre-set objectives and, they are categorized as follows:
§ Government
b. The Communities
c. Private Individuals
d. Innovations in ICT
(the internet web 2.0 tools).
2. The PURPOSES pillar represents the objectives
or goals that each input is meant to serve as follows:
a. Government -
purposed for providing policy directions, enforcement, relevant legal
frameworks and initial funding and enabling environment for decent living and
proof of concept.
b. The Communities –
Purposed for stirring government for action, mobilizing participation;
providing machinery for public promotions, re-orientation and; providing
oversight functions for government’s roles and their crime prevention
institutions.
c. Private Individuals –
Purposed for taking action against crime through interaction, collaboration and
timely information sharing to expose all appearances of crime.
d. Innovations in ICT
– the means for providing the platform for the interaction and collaboration of
all parties.
3. The INTERMEDIARIES Pillar – these are the mediators,
their place and details of their roles are as outlined in the figure (next
page) presenting the framework. They represent factors that are capable
of influencing the activities and the outcomes in the processes section. These
factors can either create positive or negative influences.
4. The ACTIVITIES Pillar - this falls within the
processes section and are reflections of the performances of the outlined PURPOSES for the actualization of the expected
outcomes. Details are as listed in the framework presentation.
5. The OUTCOME Pillar – this is the output which
holds the result, and the result comes either as positive or negative outcome.
The Positive indicates the realization of the pre-set goals whereas negative
outcome indicates failure which may have been influenced by the factors in the
intermediaries. Details are as explained in the framework.


No comments:
Post a Comment